Household Guide
Household Guide AI in Legal Practice
Nationally accessible seminars

AI in LAW practice

Legal professionals are navigating a shift that no prior generation of lawyers has faced: machine-generated analysis entering courtrooms, contracts, and compliance workflows.

Household Guide runs structured seminars that examine this shift directly — what these tools do, where they fail, and what practitioners need to understand before relying on them.

Legal professional reviewing AI-assisted case materials

What DRIVES this work

Seminar participants discussing AI legal tools

Household Guide was built around a specific gap: most legal education treats AI as a future concern, while practitioners are already encountering it in document review, contract generation, and predictive analytics. The seminars address that gap with current, specific content.

Each session is structured around real scenarios — a contract clause produced by a language model, a risk score generated by a predictive tool, a jurisdiction where automated decisions are already in use. Participants examine these cases and discuss their implications.

AI-generated legal document analysis session
2024 Platform founded — responding to a gap in practitioner-level AI education
6 Core seminar modules covering distinct areas of AI application in law
14+ Jurisdictions represented across participant cohorts to date
Structured legal seminar session in progress

The people behind HOUSEHOLD GUIDE

A small team of legal educators and technology researchers who believe that understanding a tool's limits is as important as knowing how to use it.

Structured depth

Sessions move from foundational concepts to contested edge cases, giving participants a layered understanding rather than surface-level familiarity.

Practitioner focus

Content is built for working legal professionals — not students or general audiences. Examples draw from active practice areas and current tooling.

Peer exchange

Each seminar includes structured discussion segments where participants share how AI tools have appeared in their own practice — problems, surprises, and open questions.

Seminar lead and legal technology researcher

Tomasz Wierzbicki

Program Director

Tomasz spent over a decade advising on technology policy in civil law jurisdictions before shifting to education. He leads curriculum development and moderates the advanced seminar track.

Brigitte Fonteneau

Research Lead

Brigitte focuses on how algorithmic tools intersect with due process requirements across different legal systems. She contributes case material and facilitates the ethics-oriented sessions.

Online seminar interface showing legal AI discussion
Participant reviewing AI-generated legal analysis